Graphics Automation for BBC 2010 Election Coverage
The BBC election night programme spanned a marathon twenty hours of live broadcasting, drew in results from 649 constituencies across the UK, and relied on Idonix graphics automation to tell the story of the night.
Think we could be a good fit for your next project? Get in touch
Situation
Numbers obviously play a huge part in live election coverage, so a correspondingly huge amount of technology is required to process and present these numbers.
The BBC needed a system that could:
- Consume detailed real-time data feeds from the results servers
- Process and aggregate this data into “bite sized chunks”
- Push it to numerous real-time graphics rendering systems
- Provide information displays for the programme’s presenters and production staff
- Offer all these features to both the London and Glasgow operations
Solution
Idonix supplied a scripted IGO system to drive the three render heads required by David Dimbleby’s graphics operation, along with suitably formatted data for Jeremy Vine’s VR graphics and Emily Maitlis’s touch screen. The system incorporated nine concurrent users inputting graphics and driving them to air, and integrated into real-time XML data feeds from the results servers.
A second system was installed at the BBC’s Pacific Quays studios in Glasgow, providing graphics to BBC Scotland’s English and Gaelic language services.
Straight To Air
Straight-to-air generation of results tally and headline flashes.
Device Interlocking
IGO’s output device interlocking allows four workstations to concurrently drive a single render head.
Type-In Graphics
Speedy input of templated “type-in” graphics, with formatting and image selectors.
Monitoring
"IGOView" monitoring feeds to information displays hidden in David Dimbleby’s desk.
Formatting
IGO's results processing determines which parties are represented on the graphics, and intelligently applies rounding and formatting rules.
Synchronisation
The "IGOBridge" service keeps implementation resources synchronised between sites, whilst keeping graphics separate.
Benefits
- Distributed script architecture allowed changes in functionality to be made during rehearsal, and even whilst on air
- IGO’s flexible transmission stack allocation allowed the operation to be governed by editorial demands and not by limitations in technology
- The same “look and feel” on two different sites, each with their own editorial control
- Consistent presentation rules across all graphics services
- Minimal user training requirements
